Job analysis methods

What is job analysis?

What is job analysis?

A job analysis is a procedure for identifying and defining in detail the precise job criteria and activities, as well as their relative relevance for a certain position. Work analysis is the term used to describe a process in which everyone evaluates the information gathered during a job.

It’s crucial to remember that job analysis doesn’t strive to focus on the person performing the work; rather, it seeks to focus on the job itself. The results of a job analysis will still be a description or definition of the job, not of the individual, even though they can only be conducted through a series of interviews and questionnaires.

Methods of job analysis

Choosing one approach or a mix of more than one method depends on the needs and requirements of the company as well as the goals of the job analysis process, even if there are many ways to gather information from job analyses. Typically, all of the methods concentrate on gathering fundamental job-related data, but when used in tandem, they may reveal obscure or missed data and show to be excellent instruments for finding the ideal applicant for the job.

The organizational structure, level of the hierarchy, type of work, and responsibilities and obligations associated with it all play a role in choosing the best job analysis technique. The data gathered via this procedure serves a significant purpose and aids firms in coping with current market trends, organizational changes, high attrition rates, and many other day-to-day issues. Therefore, before implementing any strategy, all advantages and cons should be examined.

Let’s talk about a few job analysis techniques that businesses frequently employ to research the requirements of a particular job.

Observational Method

Observational Method:

Three methodologies are used in this method: direct observation, work methods analysis, and critical incident technique. The first method involves closely observing and documenting an employee’s behavior in various contexts. The second includes a study of time and motion and is intended for assembly-line or manufacturing workers. The third is identifying successful work behaviors.

Actual observation

Direct observation is a technique for work analysis that entails paying attention to and documenting actions taken by an individual or group while they carry out their jobs. The observation strategy can only be effective when the job analyst is knowledgeable enough to know what to monitor, how to analyze, and what is being seen.

Workflow Analysis

Work methods analysis, often known as a factory or assembly-line jobs, is a term used to describe manual and repetitive industrial tasks. The analysis of work procedures includes time and motion studies as well as micro-motion analysis.

Method for Critical Incidents

The critical incident technique is a strategy for gathering data by following a series of steps. Using the critical incident approach, the observer records significant human behaviors, skills used, and events at work. The employees’ management offers all incident details in the critical incident procedure. 

This method is extremely subjective in comparison to other approaches, which may be quite objective and just require ratings of 5/10 or less. It helps define the competencies, knowledge, skills, abilities, and other attributes required for a task or group of tasks related to a profession. The observer takes into account both the job holder’s necessary mental and physical skills.

Interview technique

The analyst will ask a worker about their responsibilities using the interview method. They seek to gain knowledge about the same components of the profession that they could have observed through observation, such as the systems used, the procedures followed, and the usage of abilities to produce results. The interviewee might create their own working styles using this technique to fulfill a certain position. To obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the duties, analysts may speak with numerous people performing the same duties.

 Using a questionnaire

The most popular employment analysis technique may be the questionnaire approach. In order to gather crucial job-related information, the jobholders are given a well-designed questionnaire. Once completed, the questionnaires are given to the supervisors. Supervisors can learn more about a number of subjects by communicating with jobholders directly. The success of the strategy depends on a number of variables. 

All job-related behaviors and tasks must be covered by the structured questionnaire. Each action or behavior should be categorized in accordance with its significance, degree of difficulty, frequency, and connection to overall performance. The many components of employees’ jobs should be rated, and the findings should be recorded on paper. The ratings are examined to identify the actual work requirements.

Once everything is complete, the data is sent to the task analyzer. It comprises of the following six techniques:

Position Analysis Questionnaire Model (PAQ):

The PAQ Model is a questionnaire-based approach for employment analysis. It is a structured tool for work analysis developed by Mc Cormick, Jeanneret, and Mecham in 1972 to assess job characteristics and relate them to personality traits. It is composed of 194 task elements, which are grouped into six broad sections and define typical human work behaviors. The PAQ gives managers the ability to logically and quantitatively group linked job components into job dimensions. Here are some of them:

  • Activities of Employees in the PAQ Model
  • Adding information
  • Mental Function
  • Physical Exercise
  • Relations with other people
  • Task Context
  • Additional Job Features
  •  The Functional Job Analysis (FJA) Model

The Employment and Training Administration of the US Department of Labor developed the FJA model as a job analysis methodology. There are three worker-function scales that measure how much time is spent with data, people, and things, one worker-instruction scale, and three measures that evaluate reasoning, mathematics, and language make up the seven scales (numbers) that make up this assessment.

Working Profile System (WPS Model):

Working Profile System (WPS Model):

Saville & Holdsworth, Ltd. developed a questionnaire method for work analysis known as the WPS Model. It is a system for work analysis that is controlled by computers. The WPS is managed by a computer on a company’s property.  It includes a systematic questionnaire that assesses ability and personality traits in areas such as Hearing, Sight, Taste, Smell, Touch, Body Coordination, Verbal Skills, Number Skills, Complex Management Skills, Personality, and Team Role, among others. 

 MOSAIC Model: 

The MOSAIC Model is a job analysis questionnaire approach that collects data from incumbents and supervisors. It includes 151 job activities that are prioritized for successful job performance and 22 skills that are prioritized for entry-level competency.

Model of the Common Metric Questionnaire (CMQ):

The CMQ model is a job analysis approach created by Harvey as a “worker-oriented” job analysis tool that may be used for a wide range of exempt and nonexempt employees. It contains 41 basic background questions, 62 questions about interactions with people, 80 questions about decision-making, 53 questions about physical and mechanical tasks, and 47 questions about work settings.

FJAS Model (Fleishman Job Analysis System):

The FJAS model, formerly the Manual for Ability Requirements Scales, is a job analysis approach that characterizes occupations in required capabilities. It comprises 52 cognitive, physical, psychomotor, and sensory ability categories, each of which has two parts: an operational and differential definition and a grading scale.

 Daily practice

 Daily practice

The daily technique involves an employee keeping a record of the chores they complete each day. This can be done over a predetermined time frame, such as a week, in which they list their activities and the amount of time they spend on each. This can be a methodical technique to learn how employees spend their time and to spot places where they might turn their focus to more crucial duties.

The functional job analysis approach

A formal way to assess a job and record quantitative outcomes is functional job analysis. This implies that they may combine a number of various approaches to learn everything there is to know about both the role and the actor.In order to offer opportunities for improvement, analysts can determine what the personal and technical constraints are within a role. The functional job analysis method is frequently used by businesses to develop new job descriptions or job advertisements based on the requirements for the roles.

Method using job inventories

An organized checklist that employees can use to mark off jobs as completed is included in job inventories. This typically stems from a role’s job description or a manager’s expectation that they are carrying out specific tasks or using specific equipment. The tasks themselves, the team members, or the requirements for each position can be the subject of these checklists.

Job performance method

The job performance method involves the analyst taking on the role of the employee in order to learn more. This could be responding to emails, carrying out practical duties, and interacting with coworkers or systems in order to understand what an employee goes through. They can identify some of the problems and demands thanks to their first-hand knowledge, and they can help employers appropriately describe these in job descriptions


Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: